From the "lycée français de Pondichéry" The french high school of the indian South.
2/2/12
So Here it is.
Thales Miletus was the innovator of the theorem, a great greek philosopher and mathimatician too.
He was born around 624BC and died in 546BC.
He discovered many thing like the five theorems.
Even though, eguptians and babylonians were the first to discover this theorem, it took the name of the one who prooved it : Thales.
It's a particular case of the intercept theorems.
So, Thales' theorem says : if A, B and C are points on a circle where the line AC is a diameter of the circle, then the angle ABC is a right angle.
2/1/12
The Theorem of Pythagoras
Pythagoras of Samos was a Greek philosopher who lived around 530 BC, mostly in the Greek colony of Crotona in southern Italy. According to tradition he was the first to prove the assertion (theorem) which today bears his name:
If a triangle has sides of length (a,b,c), with sides (a,b) enclosing an angle of 90 degrees ("right angle"), then
a2 + b2 = c2
A right angle can be defined here as the angle formed when two straight lines cross each other in such a way that all 4 angles produced are equal. The theorem also works the other way around and that is called the reciprocal of the Pythagorean theorem: if the lengths of the three sides (a,b,c) of a triangle satisfy the above relation, then the angle between sides a and b must be of 90 degrees.
Examples of both of the theorem
In the triangle LNM right angled in N we have for after the Pythagorean theorem:
LM² = LN² +NM²
LM2 =4² +3² =25
LM=√25=5
So we can conclude that that LM is equal to 5.
SHOW THAT THIS TRIANGLE IS RIGHT ANGLED:
BC² =13²=169
AB²+BC²=5²+12²=169
As BC2=AB2+BC2, for after the reciprocal of the Pythagorean theorem, the triangle ABC is right angled in A.
Proof of the Pythagorean theorem:
Bhaskara's first Proof of the Pythagorean Theorem:
Bhaskara was born in India. He was one of the most important Hindu mathematicians of the second century AD.
He used the following diagrams in proving the Pythagorean Theorem In the above diagrams, the blue triangals are all congruent and the yellow squares are congruent. First we need to find the area of the big square two different ways. First let's find the area using the area formula for a square.
Thus, A=c^2.
Now, lets find the area by finding the area of each of the components and then sum the areas.
Area of the blue triangles = 4(1/2)ab
Area of the yellow square = (b-a)^2
Area of the big square = 4(1/2)ab + (b-a)^2
= 2ab + b^2 - 2ab + a^2
= b^2 + a^2
Since, the square has the same area no matter how you find it
A = c^2 = a^2 + b^2.
By Vicnèche and Karan
1/30/12
Napoleon's theorem, French Emperor's Theorem

OuterNapoleonsTheorem
If equilateral triangles DeltaABE_(AB), DeltaBCE_(BC), and DeltaACE_(AC) are erected externally on the sides of any triangle DeltaABC, then their centers N_(AB), N_(BC), and N_(AC), respectively, form an equilateral triangle (the outer Napoleon triangle) DeltaN_(AB)N_(BC)N_(AC). An additional property of the externally erected triangles also attributed to Napoleon is that their circumcircles concur in the first Fermat point X (Coxeter 1969, p. 23; Eddy and Fritsch 1994). Furthermore, the lines AE_(BC), BE_(AC), and CE_(AB) connecting the vertices of DeltaABC with the opposite vectors of the erected triangles also concur at X.
This theorem is generally attributed to Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821), although it has also been traced back to 1825 (Schmidt 1990, Wentzel 1992, Eddy and Fritsch 1994).

InnerNapoleonsTheorem
Analogous theorems hold when equilateral triangles DeltaABE_(AB)^', DeltaBCE_(BC)^', and DeltaACE_(AC)^' are erected internally on the sides of a triangle DeltaABC. Namely, the inner Napoleon triangle DeltaN_(AB)^'N_(BC)^'N_(AC)^' is equilateral, the circumcircles of the erected triangles intersect in the second Fermat point X^', and the lines connecting the vertices AE_(BC)^', BE_(AC)^', and C^'E_(AB) concur at X^'.
Amazingly, the difference between the areas of the outer and inner Napoleon triangles equals the area of the original triangle (Wells 1991, p. 156).
Drawing the centers of one equilateral triangle inwards and two outwards gives a 30 degrees-30 degrees-120 degrees triangle (Wells 1991, p. 156).
NapoleonsTheoremGen

Napoleon's theorem has a very beautiful generalization in the case of externally constructed triangles: If similar triangles of any shape are constructed externally on a triangle such that each is rotated relative to its neighbors and any three corresponding points of these triangles are connected, the result is a triangle which is similar to the external triangles (Wells 1991, pp. 156-157).
1/23/12
TRIGONOMETRY
Trigonometry is a branch of mathematics that studies triangles and the relationship between their sides and their angles .


1/19/12
The Intercept theorem
Euclid is renowned for writing The Elements, in thirteen books he tried to compile all the mathematic definitions, theorems and proof. He also wrote the proof of the intercept theorem, in his 6th book. So let’s get started:

We have a triangle ODC with (AB)//(DC), now watch:
• ABDC=ABIC+ADIC
• AAID+ ADIC= ABIC+ADIC
• AAID= ABIC

AOAB= (OA*h)/2
AODB= (OD*h)/2
AOAB/ AODB= OA/OD
In the same way, k is the height issued from A.
AOAB= (OB*k)/2
AOAC= (OC*k)/2
AOAB/ AOAC= OB/OC
AODB=ADIA+AOAIB=ABIC+AOAIB=AOAC
We can conclude that: OA/OD=OB/OC
Are you saying that we forgot something? Hmm, you're
right, it's not over yet, we didn't talk about AB/DC, thanks

for remainding us.
Let’s continue, we have (AE)//(OC).
If we use the same method as earlier, we will get:
DA/DO=DE/DC
AO/DO=EC/DC
And ABCE is a parallelogram so we have: EC/DC=AB/DC
OA/OD=AB/DC=OB/OC
And that’s all!
A project by Guillaume LARROUTUROU & Ismaïl RAZACK.
1/2/12
Square root of two, an irrational number: how to prove it?
And it continues!!
What is a rational number?
It is a number which can be expressed in the form a/b, a fraction in its lowest terms, where a and b are two integers (whole numbers), and b different from 0 and 1.
And expressing √2 in this form is not obvious!
So now we're going to prove that it's irrational, by contradiction, that means:
If it was a rational number, then
√2=a/b
2=a²/b²
2b²=a²
Now we know that a² is even, because it is a multiple of 2, and we can deduce that a is also even! Why?
If a is even, then it equals to a multiple of two: a=2 x k
a²=a x a
substituting a by 2k
a²=2k x 2k
which gives us
a² is also even!
then
Being a multiple of 2, b² is even, in the same way, b is also even.
But we have started the process, saying that a/b is in its lowest terms but they are both even, which means that they can be simplified by two.
By ADY Canimozhi and SIVAPRAGASSAM Aswin